refers to your landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:

Mainly because of the recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been probable under the previous Model with the law.

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment on the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that whilst the crime of murder was recognized, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for considering mitigating factors during sentencing.

Deterrence: The dread of severe outcomes, together with capital punishment, is meant to prevent prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is vital in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.

139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been in the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of your petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we're clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, matter to availability of vacancy issue to the approval of your competent authority.

Please use 1 username and password established from the options. If it does not work please try out the other. Every single allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that although looking at the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must evaluate the benefit of many of the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates who are found to get most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored through the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of the respondent department.

Any court may perhaps search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for here legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment with the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of regulation.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Additionally, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.